Zeroed out? Zeroed in?

If buffalo take out wolves, perhaps. Or if wolves dine on bison. Or, weirdly, they both do each other in?

Or heck. What if nuthin' takes nuthin'? Does that qualify as being zeroed out? Or does bison think he conquers wolf, wolf thinks he conquers bison and later somehow both learn opposite, so bison, wolf haphazardly meet. Wolf or Buffalo. Does each think themselves victimized? I think the analogy breaks down here. Lions don't usually lie down with lambs or co-mingle. Unless each was lionlamb or lamblion to begin with (or something like that).

Bilfwoson, or Wobilsonif, or something. Are there two sides? Maybe two sides now as one. (maybe we were all ill-functioning as one) And are we now over the fence to somewhere else?

Is this a canceling out because we can jump the fence together, something singular (but multi-leveled), and is there something new/more, a later more complete together? Hard to know.

(6/14 Hmmm. Having looked at this entry a day later makes me wonder what I was thinking to post something that really doesn't make that much sense in terms of the two animals I was describing and also lacks sense in the words department. It makes me cringe, really. But the underlying stuff in this entry is heartfelt and well-meant. I'll just have to come up with a better way of saying it that doesn't make me or others cringe to read my messy-thought, "huh?" laden crap. I'll save it as a reminder of what I wanted, or attempted to express.)